Logo

You should send a pre-action protocol (PAP) letter to Home Office UKVI before filing an immigration Judicial Review (JR) in Court and ask the Home Office UKVI to reconsider its refusal decision within 14 days. Sunrise Solicitors has extensive experience in handling PAP for judicial review. Call us today and get free initial advice from our expert team.

What is Judicial Review?

Judicial Review is a legal process where the courts review the lawfulness of decisions, actions, or failures to act by public bodies including the Home Office. Judicial Review is a remedy of last resort, only available when no adequate alternative remedy (such as a statutory appeal or administrative review) exists.

You can challenge a Home Office decision by Judicial Review on the following legal grounds:

  • Illegality: The Home Office acted outside its powers or broke the law.
  • Irrationality: The decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable body could have made it.
  • Procedural Impropriety/Unfairness: Failure to follow fair process, natural justice, or published procedures.

If you need expert guidance to challenge Home Office decision by Judicial review, we at Sunrise Solicitors can guide you every step of the way. 

What Is A Pre-Action Protocol (PAP)

A Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) letter is a letter sent to the Home Office, UKVI to resolve disputes before initiating Judicial Review (JR) proceedings against the Home Office UKVI. A Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) letter may also be called a ’letter before claim’ or a ’letter before action’.  All of these terms refer to the same thing. The Pre-Action Protocol, set out in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), is a mandatory first step before initiating Judicial Review proceedings in immigration, nationality, and asylum cases.  

Purpose Of Pre-Action Protocol (PAP)

The purpose of pre-action protocol (PAP) letter is to identify the issues in dispute and establish whether litigation with the Home Office, UKVI can be avoided. The letter contains the date and details of the immigration decision (the refusal letter), act or omission of the Home Office UKVI being challenged and a clear summary of the facts on which the Judicial Review claim against the Home Office, UKVI is based.

It also contains the details of any relevant information that the applicant is seeking from the Home Office, UKVI and an explanation of why this is considered relevant.

Drafting your PAP letter clearly and concisely will improve your chances of early resolution. When requesting documents or information from the Home Office, always explain why your request is relevant and ensure requests are proportionate.

What Should a Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) Letter Contain? 

The letter should contain the proposed defendant’s details, the claimant’s details, any defendant reference details, and the claimant’s legal representative (if applicable). It should also set out the decision being challenged, identify any interested parties, summarise the issues, and state the remedy sought. The letter should include ADR proposals, requests for further information and documents, an address for reply and service of documents, and a proposed response date. 

Submitting a Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) Letter to the Home Office  

The Home Office provides a standard Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) form for Immigration, Nationality, and Asylum cases. 

It is strongly recommended to seek advice from an experienced immigration lawyer before sending your PAP letter. Legal professionals can help ensure all necessary information is included and your claim is as strong as possible. 

The following are the two ways to submit a PAP letter to the Home Office:  

  • The PAP letter can be submitted electronically to the official Home Office email address: UKVIPAP@homeoffice.gov.uk.  
  • Alternatively, it can be sent by post to: Litigation Allocation Unit, 6 New Square, Bedfont Lakes, Feltham, Middlesex, TW14 8HA. 

Response To Pre-Action Protocol (PAP)

Immigration Judicial Review (JR) proceedings against the UKVI are not normally issued until the proposed reply date given in the letter before claim has passed, unless the circumstances of the immigration case require more immediate action to be taken. Home Office UKVI, should normally respond to letter before action (pre-action protocol letter) within 14 days and Home Office UKVI may face cost implications for failure to respond to pre-action protocol (PAP) letter unless there are good reasons for not responding within that period.

An application for permission to apply for Judicial Review can be filed in the Upper Tribunal or Administrative Court (High Court), as the case may be, if the Home Office, UKVI do not respond to the pre-action protocol letter within 14 days or the Home Office UKVI responds within 14 days but maintains their decision to refuse the immigration application.

The protocol does not affect the time limit specified by CPR Part 54.5(1) namely that an application for permission to apply for Judicial Review (JR) must be made promptly and in any event not later than 3 months after the grounds upon which the claim is based first arose.

What Happens After a Pre-Action Protocol Letter Has Been Sent? 

After sending a PAP letter, the Home Office may overturn its refusal, issue a new decision, or uphold its position. If your issue is not resolved through the PAP process, you can apply for permission to proceed with Judicial Review (provided you comply with the strict time limit) within 14 days.  

An application for permission to apply for Judicial Review can be filed in the Upper Tier Tribunal, as the case may be, if the Home Office, UKVI do not respond to the pre-action protocol letter within 14 days or the Home Office UKVI responds within 14 days but maintains their decision to refuse the immigration application. 

The court may penalise any party including the Home Office or claimant who fails to properly follow the PAP process or consider Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).  

Urgent Judicial Review Applications 

In very urgent cases, such as where removal from the UK is imminent or there is a serious and immediate risk of harm, you may issue a Judicial Review claim without following the usual Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) steps. However, you must still notify the Home Office of the urgency, usually by phone and in writing (email or fax), and provide a draft of the claim form where possible.

You must also inform the court why the PAP could not be followed and, if necessary, make an application for urgent interim relief to prevent the decision from being carried out. It is important to understand that sending a PAP letter or issuing a claim does not, on its own, stop removal or other enforcement action.

 

Costs, Risks, and Importance of Compliance 

Not following the Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) can result in the court imposing penalties, including costs orders against you, even if you later win your case. The court may also consider non-compliance when making decisions about how your case proceeds and can make adverse case management orders. 

As a general rule, in Judicial Review proceedings, the losing party is usually required to pay the reasonable legal costs of the winning party. This means that if your Judicial Review is unsuccessful, you may have to pay the Home Office’s legal costs. Conversely, if you win, the Home Office may be ordered to pay your reasonable legal costs. However, the court has discretion and may make a different order depending on the circumstances of the case. 

Legal aid may be available for eligible claimants to cover the costs of preparing a PAP letter and obtaining related legal advice, subject to a means and merits test. You can check eligibility and get more information at the Legal Aid Agency. 

How Can We Help?

As specialist immigration solicitors, we can represent you in your pre-action protocol (PAP) letter for Judicial Review (JR) against the Home Office UKVI. Work to be carried out on your pre-action protocol letter by our immigration lawyers may entail the following:

  • assessing the Home Office UKVI decision to identify the grounds which render the UKVI decision unlawful and not in accordance with relevant immigration laws;
  • discussing the relevant grounds with you and advising you on the prospects of success in your matter;
  • advising you about the weaknesses and strengths of your immigration case;
  • preparing the pre-action protocol (PAP) representations and discussing the same with you before submitting them to the Home Office UKVI;
  • submitting the pre-action protocol representations to the Home Office, Judicial Review Management Unit and liaise with them for a response to your pre-action protocol letter;
  • assessing the UKVI response to pre-action protocol letter and discussing the same with you;
  • re-assessing the merits of the case upon receiving the UKVI response to find out whether you still have a good case to proceed with the Judicial Review (JR) proceedings;
  • advising you on the merits of the case after re-assessing the case in the light of the UKVI response.

How Much We Charge?

Unless your matter is very complicated, our fees for a pre-action protocol (PAP) are as given in the fee table below:

Our Service Fixed Fee Range Hourly Rate
Pre-action protocol (PAP) for Judicial Review (JR) against the Home Office UKVI From £500 + VAT To £5,000 + VAT From £150 + VAT to £350 + VAT per hour

The agreed fixed fee or hourly rate will depend on the complexity of your matter and the volume of work involved in the matter.

Ask A Question For Free Advice

Our Clients Feedback

ExcellentGoogle star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 54.92336 reviews
4.9Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Excellent2336 reviews
Posted on Google Google
Laura Fennell profile picture
Laura Fennell
24 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Tariq has been the most amazing help over the past several months. He guided my husband and I through our Fiance visa and Partner FLR M visa. Both times Tariq made sure we provided ample evidence, submitted everything in a timely manner, and communicated any potential issues. We are so grateful for everything and highly recommend this practice to anyone needing similar services!
Posted on Google Google
Dom profile picture
Dom
23 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I got great service from Amir Naviwala. Very timely and provided detailed explanations where I needed. I'll definitely recommend him.
Posted on Google Google
Lauren Penn profile picture
Lauren Penn
22 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Omar Naviwala was excellent. He provided advice for my upcoming ILR application. He was patient, thorough, professional and generous with his time. I cannot recommend enough.
Posted on Google Google
Pranav Kp profile picture
Pranav Kp
21 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
great experience
Posted on Google Google
Aws profile picture
Aws
21 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I don’t usually leave reviews like this at all, but I couldn’t not leave one for sunrise solicitors and particularly Mr Rizwy for all the time, effort and patience they had working on my case and providing me with the service that they did. I am very particular about details, especially with something this important, and my case involved a huge amount of evidence, documents and information that needed to be properly understood rather than just read through because it was extremely personal and the case is about more than just paperwork. I asked a lot of questions and raised things to him repeatedly when I was worried about them, and sent a massive amount of material for him to deal with. At no point did I feel like I was being rushed, ignored or treated as difficult. If I raised something, he listened to it. If something needed checking, he checked it. And when I needed something explained, he explained it properly rather than giving me a vague answer and moving on. That’s probably what I appreciated the most working with sunrise solicitors. I am extremely grateful to Mr Rizwy and everyone at Sunrise Solicitors for the amount of work they put into my case and for the patience they showed me throughout. I have been dealing with this matter for a long time, so having a solicitor I could actually trust with it meant a great deal to me. I have nothing but positive things to say about the way they handled my case.
Posted on Google Google
Shayanta Laskar profile picture
Shayanta Laskar
21 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a really positive experience with Usman Ahmad at Sunrise Solicitors, who handled my British citizenship application under the supervision of Amir Naviwala. Usman was very approachable, responsive and easy to deal with throughout the whole process. He kept me updated, answered all of my questions clearly and made sure everything was in order before the application was submitted. I also really appreciated how quickly he would contact me whenever there was an update. I would also like to thank Amir Naviwala for supervising the case and helping to make sure everything was handled properly. My application was approved very quickly and the Home Office did not ask for any further information, which gave me a lot of confidence in how well the application had been prepared. I would definitely recommend Usman, Amir and the team at Sunrise Solicitors to anyone looking for reliable and professional immigration support.
Posted on Google Google
Isabelle Lott profile picture
Isabelle Lott
21 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Prompt, thorough advice offered in a kind and reassuring manner. I am very grateful to Mr Amir Naviwala for his efficient, professional and timely responses. I happily recommend Sunrise solicitors.
Posted on Google Google
Abhineet Singh profile picture
Abhineet Singh
18 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Outstanding Service for My ILR Application Today I received the news that my ILR application has been granted, and I wanted to take a moment to thank Usman Ahmad and the entire team at Sunrise Solicitors. I have dealt with many professionals over the years, but what stood out about Usman was that I never felt like just another case number. Throughout the process, he was patient, honest, and always willing to answer my questions, no matter how small they seemed. Immigration applications can be stressful because so much depends on getting things right, but having someone knowledgeable and dependable in your corner makes a huge difference. What I appreciated most was the confidence and reassurance he provided from start to finish. Every document, requirement, and query was handled professionally, which allowed me to focus on my family and work without constantly worrying about the application. Receiving my ILR approval today is an important milestone for me and my family, and I genuinely appreciate the support Usman provided in helping me reach it. My wife, daughter, and son will be making their applications in the future, and I already know who I will be instructing. I will definitely be returning to Usman and Sunrise Solicitors for their applications. Thank you once again for your dedication, professionalism, and support throughout my journey. Highly recommended.
Posted on Google Google
Rosetta Crawford profile picture
Rosetta Crawford
17 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Usman Ahmad was very good for advise on ilr application date. Thank you
Posted on Google Google
Sunny Ebegbare profile picture
Sunny Ebegbare
11 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I recently completed the second 2.5-year extension of my residency with Sunrise Solicitors. Mr Asif Rizwy handled both extensions and was professional, proactive, and genuinely invested in my case. His guidance and attention to detail played an important role in the success of my application. What stood out most was that working with Mr Asif felt like working with someone who truly cared about the outcome. Thank you, Mr Asif and Sunrise Solicitors. I would also like to thank Ritvee at Sunrise Solicitors. Her calm, reassuring manner when speaking with clients made me feel confident that I was in the right place. Thank you, Ritvee. I would highly recommend Sunrise Solicitors to anyone looking for professional, supportive, and reliable immigration legal services.